60: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:20:23 ID:IPaF

斬撃特化型と殴打特化型の違いなんだよなあ
鎧は騎士がどの程度の強度の鎧持ってたかわからんから刀が通じるのかわからん

66: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:22:33 ID:StfV

今調べたら騎士が勝つんやって
甲冑は刀も槍も通さんし重さも現代のフル装備の兵士より軽いらしい
一方武士の鎧は役に立たない

The knight wins. Their armor, even in the early years, is practically incapable of being cut through
, and later armor got to the point where even early firearms were ineffective.
Does that mean they were heavy? Not as much as people think. In fact, it was lighter than what soldiers today lug around.
Their training was began from an early age in a large variety of weapons as well as unarmed. Their weapons, from the simply sword and shield combo, to the mace, the lance, and other weapons would give the a wide variety of choices in order to deal with opponents.
Even samurai armor would be useless against say, a mace. Plus the long sword was a lot more versatile than a katana. How? Well for one, you could flip the longsword around in your hand and use either the cross guard or pommel as a smaller and lighter war hammer.
The katana was mostly "cut" (which most knight armors are impervious too) or "thrust" (which is not the primary design of it).

70: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:24:08 ID:ClOG

>>66
だからどの時代のかってのが結構重要になるんよな

72: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:24:17 ID:bB43

>>66
それどっから持ってきた？読みたい

89: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:28:18 ID:StfV

>>72
ここや
https://www.quora.com/If-you-put-a-knight-and-a-samurai-in-a-fight-who-would-win-Limit-answers-to-age-periods-e-g-11th-century-knight-vs-11th-century-samurai

類似の質問も含め全員騎士が勝つと答えとる

75: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:25:20 ID:FDRf

うーん
https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/nwknews/imgs/e/a/ea2dbd98.jpg

https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/nwknews/imgs/e/e/ee3c3b0f.jpg

77: 名無しさん＠おーぷん 23/07/03(月) 17:25:36 ID:S3Rp

>>75
まず日本の馬ってちっちゃいんやろ？